T.S. Eliot famously wrote that the world would end “not with a bang but a whimper”. The Obama administration must be Mr. Eliot’s biggest fans.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law, amid great fanfare, on March 23, 2010. Major rules and edicts are released by Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, almost every Friday. The entire process, if neither practical nor well thought out, has at least been well choreographed. So imagine the universal surprise everyone experienced with last Tuesday’s whispered announcement.
Mark Mazur, Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy at the Treasury Department, posted in an official blog that the enforcement of the employer mandate would be postponed for one year. The provision that medium and large employers (50+ employees) would be required to provide adequate and affordable health insurance to their workers has been put on hold.
In a blog!
Rules and regulations will be released next week. One of the most complicated portions of the PPACA, a series of requirements that have caused businesses and insurers uncounted headaches since the day the law was passed, is kicked back a year and the information is released through a blog, during a holiday week, while the President is on a plane thousands of miles from the U.S.
Now don’t get me wrong, this blog has asserted as recently as last week that the PPACA needed significant revisions and that it was a shame that the Democrats in Congress seemed incapable of fixing even the largest of problems. They still aren’t. The Administration should be commended for doing something, anything, to avert what has been called a “train wreck”.
Style Points – 0
We are waiting for the details to award points on substance.
Before we get to what this means, let’s first hear from the usual suspects. Fans of the PPACA were swift to point out that they never really liked the employer mandate.
Ezra Klein noted in Wonkblog, his excellent online work for the Washington Post, that the employer mandate is a “bad bit of policy” and that it was initially pushed by business groups.
Steve Benen wrote in MaddowBlog, the official blog of MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, that this wasn’t really that big a deal since “the delay won’t affect the creation of the exchanges, which should help bridge the gap—folks working for businesses that don’t offer coverage will still be eligible for subsidies they can use to buy insurance in their state marketplace.” (Different site, same picture)Striking a conciliatory tone, E. Neil Trautwein, a vice-president of the National Retail Federation, said that is was a ‘wise move” and that it “will provide employers and businesses more time to update their health care coverage without the threat of arbitrary punishment.”
The Republican Leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) released a statement that “the fact remains that Obamacare needs to be repealed and replaced with common-sense reforms that actually lower costs for Americans.” Translation – I got nothin’
What does it mean?
According to our friends at Anthem Blue Cross, the immediate results of this decision by the Obama Administration are that certain parts of the PPACA will go into effect on 2015 instead of 2014:
I would add a fourth. If employers aren’t required to offer coverage, then group health policies (employer sponsored) are not required to comply with the PPACA’s laundry list of Essential Health Benefits. Large employers will still be able to determine whether they choose to offer Birth Control, IUD’s, and the Morning After Pill as well as other controversial elements of the President’s plan.
This last issue has been a huge point of contention. The federal government now has an additional twelve months to resolve these issues. Unfortunately, only Congress can repair the major flaws of the PPACA, and that is unlikely to happen. Even if the Democrats were capable of drafting the legislation necessary to make the PPACA effective, the Republicans are too dug in, too invested in the law’s failure at any cost, to throw it a lifesaver.
So we have been set adrift. Our only hope will be more regulatory fixes, engineered by the Administration, released by underlings in blogs or buried deep within reports. All the while employers work and rework their business plans to comply with rules that may change at any time. Dave www.bcandb.com
From the website:
ReplyDeleteDave Randolph says:
July 5, 2013 at 7:10 pm (Edit)
Dave, Excellent blog. You forgot Rush Limbaugh. He says they postponed the large group mandate until after the 2014 Mid Term elections to keep their seats in Congress.
Frome the website:
ReplyDeleteFrustrated American says:
July 6, 2013 at 12:01 pm (Edit)
Frankly, I hope the employer mandate fails completely, or is somehow eliminated! 50 employees is not a high enough ‘cutoff point’, as many smaller ‘mom and pop’ type businesses are operating on very small profit margins, and have to keep their costs low to remain competitive (such as a 24 hour diner, for example)! They don’t have the ‘deep pockets’ a larger, usually more profitable multi-national corporation does! They have enough challenges and headaches as it is! And moreover WHY should small businesses be coerced or forced into providing rapaciously expensive healthcare for their employees, with penalty of a fine? Ditto individuals! The mafia themselves couldn’t have come up with a better approach to all of this! This isn’t 1973 or 1983, when costs were much lower and fairer! And lastly, every business owner I have spoken to that falls within this ’50 or more’ category has absolutely NO CLUE or ‘road map’ as to their choices when and if the time comes to have to provide healthcare insurance for their employees! Oftentimes, even their lifelong accountants or lawyers tell them (us) that they don’t know anything about this, or how to proceed! Train wreck indeed!
I don’t think that this will change to 100+ employees or larger. I do believe that full-time, for the purposes of insurance, may be moved to 35 hours as a compromise. BUT, you must have two interested parties to negotiate a compromise. Until that happens, you simply have chaos.
ReplyDeleteBy the way Frustrated American, the person to call about insurance questions is an insurance agent!
Well, that's the government for you.
ReplyDeleteGreat post and very useful information’s.Good information.Really i am impressed from this post. Thanks a lot.
ReplyDelete