The Washington
Post, CNN,
and other news organizations published long, in-depth articles about the 2017
Republican tax
bill. The most cynical man
in Washington, Mitch
McConnell, needed to find extra money for his tax cut. And, of course, neither Mitch nor President Trump
ever passed up a chance to attack the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Eliminating the penalty for those people who
failed to purchase insurance, the Individual Mandate,
could free up as much as $300 billion.
(By the way, this is the very definition of cynicism. Without the mandate, young and healthy people
would skip insurance, prices would skyrocket, fewer people would purchase
coverage, and the government would eventually save money since fewer people
would get the tax credit subsidy help to pay their premiums!) If you read the articles or anything else from
that time, you will not find any mention of the tax bill making the PPACA
unconstitutional. Senators like Susan Collins
(R-ME) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) were still in discussions with their
Democratic counterparts to strengthen other provisions of the law.
Senator McConnell was very
aware of the dangerous game he was playing.
When asked in June of 2018 about the potential damage of the Texas
lawsuit and the Trump administration’s position, Mr. McConnell
said, “Everybody
I know in the Senate, everybody is in favor of maintaining coverage for
preexisting conditions…There is no difference in opinion whatsoever”. But Mitch had years and years of actions
that directly contradicted his words.
There were dozens of votes to repeal Obamacare. There was the fictitiously named Better
Care Reconciliation Act of 2017.
And that brings us to today.
The Trump administration
filed its brief
last night for the Supreme Court’s review of the Texas
lawsuit. Trump’s attorneys
argue that the entire Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act should be
eliminated. ALL OF IT. The administration’s position is clear. Guaranteed coverage for preexisting
conditions? Ditch it. Preventive Care?
Nope. Coverage for children to age 26? NO!
The law is irredeemable. And they
say it is all Mitch’s fault.
From Page
13 of the brief:
Nothing the 2017 Congress did demonstrates it would have intended the rest of the ACA to continue to operate in the absence of these three integral provisions. The entire ACA thus must fall with the individual mandate…
Our Republican
friends have voted countless
times to repeal Obamacare.
The Trump administration just called their bluff. And yes, it is a bluff. Always was.
There is no replacement waiting in the wings. We are talking about nearly 20% of our
economy. We are talking about the way
most Americans access and pay for health care.
And by the way, we are in the middle of a pandemic.
The Supreme Court will
hear this case in October and won’t render a decision until after the
election. How convenient. This may be all a game for some of our elected
representatives in Washington. But it is not a game
that anyone with preexisting
conditions wants to play.
DAVE
Picture – Right Game, Wrong Venue – David L Cunix
No comments:
Post a Comment